To: oped@nytimes.com |
|||
I am a great admirer of European civilization and
its achievements - not least, because I'm a European
myself; but it is time we faced up to the fact that
we are still more ape than human. Collectively,
despite calling ourselves Homo sapiens, we
are more accurately described as Earth's "Greatest
Ape"; as ethnic Europeans we might consider
ourselves to be the "Great White Ape" (or Homo
stupidus economicus). Africans may tend to look
more like apes than Europeans, but appearances can
be (and in this case certainly are) deceptive.
I'm writing this to some extent "tongue in cheek",
to amuse rather than offend my fellow white apes,
but also in order to make a serious
and rather important point,
i.e. that we really are apes, and not just
according to some theory, which most people, even if
they do not understand it, feel obliged to believe,
because authority and majority says they should.
In the 19th Century, many people were very offended
by Darwin's theory of evolution, particularly by its
implication that humans (even Europeans!) share a
common ancestor with chimps and other great apes.
But if you are acquainted with the evidence, it is
very difficult (to my mind, impossible) to deny the
extremely high probability that Darwin's theory is
essentially correct and that we humans, like all
other organisms, are the product of an evolutionary
process. We really do share a common ancestor with
apes and monkeys, and in fact, as we go back in
time, with all other animals as well.
Most serious thinkers have long accepted Darwin's
theory of evolution and of man's animal origins, but
this has not prevented them from denying to a large
extent its most important implications: those
relating to all human behavior (including their own)
and the socio-economic order, which we refer to as
Western Civilization, that developed from it.
As its creators, we white apes are very
fond of emphasizing the achievements of Western
Civilization (often assuming it to be synonymous
with "mankind" as a whole), but are reluctant to
look honestly at its short-comings; and even when we
do, our attention is directed towards the past or at
the short-comings of "other" white apes
(particularly the Germans) and the wickedness of
Nazis, Communists, "racists", or the like, thus
consolidating our own "moral high ground" and
exempting ourselves from seriously questioning it.
The truth which we are not facing up to is that our
socio-economic order (our economy and way of life)
is deeply rooted in our animal nature (if Darwin is
correct, how could it be otherwise?) and as a
consequence is inherently unsustainable
(looked at in this light, it is pretty obvious).
This is simply said (just a single sentence), but
its implications could hardly be more profound
(which is why we struggle to face up to it). It
means that we are deluding ourselves regarding our
ability to meet the challenge of global warming and
achieve sustainability for Earth's ever increasing
population of technologically empowered but
essentially insatiable "Greatest Apes" on
our finite and vulnerable planet. The inevitable
consequence is that a ruthless mother
nature (who is already "warming up" for the job)
will impose sustainability on us. We will
not like her methods one little bit, perched on our
pillar of self-righteous moral high ground as the
world around us descends into chaos, before finally
engulfing us as well - but that is what will happen
if we fail to face up to the challenge and do the
job ourselves.
Sustainability is not an option that can be accepted
or rejected. The option that we - so far, at least -
have persisted in rejecting (or rather, in not
facing up to), is of doing it ourselves. Thus
proving ourselves still to be more ape (animal) than
human. A real human being (an ape that
aspires to transcend its animal nature by attempting
to follow its more enlightened, human
nature) would put his children's and grandchildren's
future before the gratification of his own,
short-sighted, materialistic, dumb-animal
self-interests. But not the Great White Ape.
At least, that's the way it looks at the moment.
Submitted 26/06/06 |
|||